Member-only story

The Case Against the Supreme Court: A Deep Dive into the Flaws and Dangers of Judicial Supremacy

George Bernard Shaw

·10.1k Followers· Follow

Published in The Case Against The Supreme Court

6 min read · 3 weeks before

276 View Claps

17 Respond

Save

Listen

The Case Against The Supreme Court Book Cover The Case Against The Supreme Court

:

In the hallowed halls of justice, where the fate of nations hangs in the balance, the Supreme Court stands as an enigmatic and formidable entity. Its decisions, rendered by nine robed figures, have the power to shape society, determine rights, and even alter the course of history. However, beneath the veneer of impartiality and wisdom, there lies a deeply flawed and dangerous system that threatens the very foundations of democracy. In "The Case Against the Supreme Court," acclaimed legal scholar and constitutional expert Erwin Chemerinsky presents a compelling and comprehensive exposé of the flaws and dangers of judicial supremacy.

The Case Against the Supreme Court

by Erwin Chemerinsky

4.6 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1619 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	400 pages

The Tyranny of the Minority:

The Supreme Court is the only branch of the federal government that is not accountable to the electorate. Its members are appointed for life by the president and confirmed by the Senate, creating a situation where a small group of unelected individuals wields immense power over the lives of millions. As Chemerinsky argues, this lack of accountability breeds an elitism and a disconnect from the real-world concerns of ordinary citizens.

The consequences of this tyranny of the minority are far-reaching. The Court has the power to strike down laws passed by Congress and state legislatures, effectively overriding the will of the people. In recent years, the Court has issued rulings on issues such as campaign finance, affirmative action, and voting rights that have drawn widespread criticism for their partisan nature and their disregard for the democratic process.

The Assault on Democracy:

The Supreme Court's unchecked power poses a serious threat to democracy. When the Court overturns laws that have been passed by elected representatives, it undermines the fundamental principle of majority rule. As Chemerinsky explains, "The Court has become a super-legislature, making policy decisions that should be left to the elected branches of government."

This assault on democracy is particularly evident in the Court's handling of voting rights. In recent years, the Court has struck down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, making it more difficult for minorities and other marginalized groups to exercise their right to vote. These decisions have had a profound impact on the electoral process, making it harder for certain populations to have their voices heard in government.

The Erosion of Individual Rights:

The Supreme Court is also supposed to be the guardian of individual rights. However, as Chemerinsky argues, the Court's decisions have often fallen short of this ideal. In recent years, the Court has upheld laws that restrict free speech, due process, and the right to privacy. For example, the Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC allowed corporations and wealthy individuals to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns, effectively silencing the voices of ordinary citizens.

The Court's erosion of individual rights has also had a disproportionate impact on marginalized populations. For example, the Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, making it more difficult for minorities to exercise their right to vote. The Court's decisions on criminal justice have also disproportionately impacted communities of color, leading to mass incarceration and the erosion of due process rights.

The Flawed Doctrine of Judicial Review:

The foundation of the Supreme Court's power lies in the doctrine of judicial review, which gives the Court the authority to declare laws unconstitutional. As Chemerinsky explains, this doctrine is based on the assumption that the Court is capable of objectively interpreting the Constitution and determining which laws are in accordance with it. However, this assumption is deeply flawed.

The Constitution is a complex and ambiguous document, and different justices often have different interpretations of it. This inevitably leads to partisan and ideological biases influencing the Court's decisions. As Chemerinsky argues, "The idea that judges are above politics and that they can objectively interpret the Constitution is a myth."

The Need for Reform:

Given the flaws and dangers of judicial supremacy, Chemerinsky argues that it is imperative to reform the Supreme Court. He proposes several measures, including:

Expanding the number of justices to reduce the influence of any one justice.
Limiting the Court's ability to overturn laws unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution.
Making the Court more accountable to the people by requiring justices to stand for election at regular intervals.
Reforming the judicial appointment process to make it more transparent and less partisan.

These reforms would help to restore the balance of power between the branches of government and make the Supreme Court more accountable to the people it serves.

:

In "The Case Against the Supreme Court," Erwin Chemerinsky delivers a powerful and persuasive indictment of judicial supremacy. He exposes the flaws in the doctrine of judicial review, the dangers of an unelected and unaccountable judiciary, and the erosion of democracy and individual rights that has resulted from the Court's unchecked power. Chemerinsky's book is a must-read for anyone concerned about the future of American democracy and the rule of law.

The Case Against the Supreme Court

by Erwin Chemerinsky

4.6 out of 5